TigerHawk

TigerHawk (ti*ger*hawk): n. 1. The title of this blog and the nom de plume of its founding blogger; 2. A deep bow to the Princeton Tigers and the Iowa Hawkeyes; 3. The nickname for Iowa's Hawkeye logo. Posts include thoughts of the day on international affairs, politics, things that strike us as hilarious and personal observations. The opinions we express are our own, and not those of each other, our employers, our relatives, our dead ancestors, or unrelated people of similar ethnicity.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Friday afternoon exploitation post: Culturally curious pictures of Katy Perry

By TigerHawk at 11/12/2010 04:10:00 PM

Yet another example of the perfidious influence of creeping sharia law on our culture.

OK, not really.

Permalink - - Main

9 Comments:

By The Conservative Wahoo, at Fri Nov 12, 04:36:00 PM:

Love one of the comments: her "chest-muffins".

By Ignoramus, at Fri Nov 12, 04:59:00 PM:

(NSFW!) Poll Finds Majority Of Male Voters Would Have Elected Naked Woman

Many a truth is told in jest!

By OLD FAN, at Sat Nov 13, 02:02:00 AM:

Something unattractive about Celebrity as a whole, or the great lengths some go to achieve it, then try to hide from it - control it when they get it.

Her new husband was truly ugly and ignorant in regards to GW Bush.

This might seem a little rough, but as time moves on, and age sets in, look for Ms. Perry to be trying to excercise more and more. Doesn't seem she will be able to rely on musical talent.

By Locker Room, at Sat Nov 13, 07:23:00 AM:

Not familiar with Ms. Perry's work, but I have heard of her. My impression was she's a Lohanesque B-movie bad-girl, but apparently she's some sort of singer. She has a right nice shape going - one can vouchsafe that when she meets her Maker, it will not be for having drowned face down. Those are heroic blouse cakes.

By Stephen, at Sat Nov 13, 10:39:00 AM:

I am guessing you have a thing for Katy Perry.

By vza, at Sat Nov 13, 02:15:00 PM:

Will you be commenting on this:

"This week, Eric Cantor met privately with a foreign head of state to promise to undermine the foreign policy of the United States."

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_11/026624.php

By Liberal Kneejerk, at Sat Nov 13, 07:53:00 PM:

There is simply no defense for what Cantor has done here, for he is deliberately undermining the United States during a time of war, in a part of the world crucial to our success in that war, in front of an audience that does not vote in American elections. Cantor's speech is both destructive and disloyal, not because of its content -- which is as silly as it is subversive -- but because of its location and its intended audience.

By Anonymous, at Sun Nov 14, 12:38:00 AM:

Who is Katy Perry? Should I know of her?

By Gary Rosen, at Sun Nov 14, 11:20:00 PM:

I am sure vza and Liberal Kneejerk were at the forefront of efforts to condemn Ted Kennedy for this:

Kennedy and Soviets